REM: What to Store, When to Recall, What to Forget in Experience Memory for Coding Agents

Large language model (LLM) agents now autonomously complete long-horizon tasks, such as repository-level coding, through hundreds of think-act steps, yet the experience each run produces is rarely reused on the next. Prior memory systems concentrate on retrieval, finding the most relevant past trajectory. Retrieval cannot observe the running agent, so it cannot decide whether the agent needs an experience, at which point, or for how long. We introduce REM (Reusable Experience Memory), a framework that manages the memory lifecycle from inside the agent's think-act loop through three explicit decisions. What to store: each completed trajectory is consolidated into a phase-structured document, two orders of magnitude smaller than the trajectory. When to recall: the document is injected at the start of the task; the costlier implementation record is withheld until an in-loop gate detects the agent struggling. What to forget: the record is evicted after a single exposure. On repository-level bug fixing (SWE-ContextBench Lite), REM retrieves the related trajectory more accurately than every state-of-the-art memory system (68.7% vs. 55.6% match@1) and consistently improves end-task resolution (27.6% vs. 24.9%) at 17% lower cost. Injecting the same experience without a policy, even when oracle-retrieved, does not. Ablating any of the three decisions reduces resolution. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the bottleneck in experience reuse is not retrieval fidelity but lifecycle governance, opening a control-theoretic perspective on agent memory.