( events)   Timezone: »  
The 2020 schedule is still incomplete Program Highlights »
Workshop
Sat Dec 12 05:30 AM -- 03:00 PM (PST)
Navigating the Broader Impacts of AI Research
Carolyn Ashurst · Rosie Campbell · Deborah Raji · Solon Barocas · Stuart Russell





Workshop Home Page

Following growing concerns with both harmful research impact and research conduct in computer science, including concerns with research published at NeurIPS, this year’s conference introduced two new mechanisms for ethical oversight: a requirement that authors include a “broader impact statement” in their paper submissions and additional evaluation criteria asking paper reviewers to identify any potential ethical issues with the submissions.

These efforts reflect a recognition that existing research norms have failed to address the impacts of AI research, and take place against the backdrop of a larger reckoning with the role of AI in perpetuating injustice. The changes have been met with both praise and criticism some within and outside the community see them as a crucial first step towards integrating ethical reflection and review into the research process, fostering necessary changes to protect populations at risk of harm. Others worry that AI researchers are not well placed to recognize and reason about the potential impacts of their work, as effective ethical deliberation may require different expertise and the involvement of other stakeholders.

This debate reveals that even as the AI research community is beginning to grapple with the legitimacy of certain research questions and critically reflect on its research practices, there remains many open questions about how to ensure effective ethical oversight. This workshop therefore aims to examine how concerns with harmful impacts should affect the way the research community develops its research agendas, conducts its research, evaluates its research contributions, and handles the publication and dissemination of its findings. This event complements other NeurIPS workshops this year devoted to normative issues in AI and builds on others from years past, but adopts a distinct focus on the ethics of research practice and the ethical obligations of researchers.

Welcome
Morning keynote (Keynote)
Hanna Wallach, Rosie Campbell
Ethical oversight in the peer review process (Discussion panel)
Sarah Brown, Heather Douglas, Iason Gabriel, Brent Hecht, Rosie Campbell
Morning break (Break)
Harms from AI research (Discussion panel)
Anna Lauren Hoffmann, Nyalleng Moorosi, Vinay Prabhu, Deborah Raji
Predictive Policing: Should researchers engage? (Discussion panel)
Logan Koepke, CATHERINE ONEIL, Tawana Petty, Cynthia Rudin, Deborah Raji
Lunch and watch lightning talks (in parallel) from workshop submissions (Break)
Discussions with authors of submitted papers (Breakouts)
Responsible publication: NLP case study (Discussion panel)
Miles Brundage, Bryan McCann, Colin Raffel, Natalie Schulter, Zeerak Waseem, Rosie Campbell
Afternoon break (Break)
Strategies for anticipating and mitigating risks (Discussion panel)
Ashley Casovan, Timnit Gebru, Shakir Mohamed, Jess Whittlestone, Solon Barocas
The roles of different parts of the research ecosystem in navigating broader impacts (Discussion panel)
Josh Greenberg, Liesbeth Venema, Ben Zevenbergen, Solon Barocas
Closing remarks
Nose to Glass: Looking In to Get Beyond (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Josephine Seah
Ideal theory in AI ethics (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Daniel Estrada
Training Ethically Responsible AI Researchers: a Case Study (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Hang Yuan, Claudia Vanea, Federica Lucivero, Nina Hallowell
Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and Deployment (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Margarita Boyarskaya, Alexandra Olteanu, Kate Crawford, Solon Barocas
Like a Researcher Stating Broader Impact For the Very First Time (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Grace Abuhamad, Claudel Rheault
AI in the “Real World”: Examining the Impact of AI Deployment in Low-Resource Contexts (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Chinasa T. Okolo
Non-Portability of Algorithmic Fairness in India (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Nithya Sambasivan, Erin Arnesen, Ben Hutchinson, Vinod Prabhakaran
An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
David Tran, Alex Valtchanov, Keshav R Ganapathy, Raymond Feng, Eric Slud, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein
An Ethical Highlighter for People-Centric Dataset Creation (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Margot Hanley, Apoorv Khandelwal, Hadar Averbuch-Elor, Noah Snavely, Helen Nissenbaum
Auditing Government AI: Assessing ethical vulnerability of machine learning (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Alayna A Kennedy
Biased Programmers? Or Biased Data? A Field Experiment in Operationalizing AI Ethics (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Bo Cowgill, Fabrizio Dell'Acqua, Augustin Chaintreau, Nakul Verma, Samuel Deng, Daniel Hsu
The Managerial Effects of Algorithmic Fairness Activism (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Bo Cowgill, Fabrizio Dell'Acqua, Sandra Matz
Anticipatory Ethics and the Role of Uncertainty (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Priyanka Nanayakkara, Nicholas Diakopoulos, Jessica Hullman
Ethical Testing in the Real World: Recommendations for Physical Testing of Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks (Lightning talk (5-7 mins))
Ram Shankar Siva Kumar, Maggie Delano, Kendra Albert, Afsaneh Rigot, Jonathon Penney