Private data analysis faces a significant challenge known as the curse of dimensionality, leading to increased costs. However, many datasets possess an inherent low-dimensional structure. For instance, during optimization via gradient descent, the gradients frequently reside near a low-dimensional subspace. If the low-dimensional structure could be privately identified using a small amount of points, we could avoid paying for the high ambient dimension.On the negative side, Dwork, Talwar, Thakurta, and Zhang (STOC 2014) proved that privately estimating subspaces, in general, requires an amount of points that has a polynomial dependency on the dimension. However, their bound do not rule out the possibility to reduce the number of points for "easy'' instances. Yet, providing a measure that captures how much a given dataset is "easy'' for this task turns out to be challenging, and was not properly addressed in prior works.Inspired by the work of Singhal and Steinke (NeurIPS 2021), we provide the first measures that quantify "easy'' as a function of multiplicative singular-value gaps of the input dataset, and support them with new upper and lower bounds. In particular, our results determine the first type of gap that is sufficient and necessary for estimating a subspace with an amount of points that is independent of the dimension. Furthermore, we realize our upper bounds using a practical algorithm and demonstrate its advantage in high-dimensional regimes compared to prior approaches.