A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakage

The release of sensitive data often relies on synthetic data generation and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) removal, with an inherent assumption that these techniques ensure privacy. However, the effectiveness of sanitization methods for text datasets has not been thoroughly evaluated.To address this critical gap, we propose the first privacy evaluation framework for the release of sanitized textual datasets. In our framework, a sparse retriever initially links sanitized records with target individuals based on known auxiliary information. Subsequently, semantic matching quantifies the extent of additional information that can be inferred about these individuals from the matched records.We apply our framework to two datasets: MedQA, containing medical records, and WildChat, comprising individual conversations with ChatGPT. Our results demonstrate that seemingly innocuous auxiliary information, such as specific speech patterns, can be used to deduce personal attributes like age or substance use history from the synthesized dataset.We show that private information can persist in sanitized records at a semantic level, even in synthetic data. Our findings highlight that current data sanitization methods create a false sense of privacy by making only surface-level textual manipulations. This underscores the urgent need for more robust protection methods that address semantic-level information leakage.