Skip to yearly menu bar Skip to main content


Domain Adaptation meets Individual Fairness. And they get along.

Debarghya Mukherjee · Felix Petersen · Mikhail Yurochkin · Yuekai Sun

Hall J (level 1) #715

Keywords: [ Individual fairness ] [ Domain Adaptation ] [ covariate shift ]


Many instances of algorithmic bias are caused by distributional shifts. For example, machine learning (ML) models often perform worse on demographic groups that are underrepresented in the training data. In this paper, we leverage this connection between algorithmic fairness and distribution shifts to show that algorithmic fairness interventions can help ML models overcome distribution shifts, and that domain adaptation methods (for overcoming distribution shifts) can mitigate algorithmic biases. In particular, we show that (i) enforcing suitable notions of individual fairness (IF) can improve the out-of-distribution accuracy of ML models under the covariate shift assumption and that (ii) it is possible to adapt representation alignment methods for domain adaptation to enforce individual fairness. The former is unexpected because IF interventions were not developed with distribution shifts in mind. The latter is also unexpected because representation alignment is not a common approach in the individual fairness literature.

Chat is not available.