Beyond Encoder Accumulation: Measuring Encoder Roles in Multi-Encoder VLMs

As foundation models scale toward fusing more heterogeneous visual streams, understanding how diverse encoders interact under joint training becomes a prerequisite for principled design. Yet large vision-language models (LVLMs) currently lack the tools to do so, and parameter-efficient encoder configurations remain hard to identify before training. To re-examine encoder roles under joint training, on the 16-benchmark Cambrian-1 suite we retrain and evaluate all 31 non-empty subsets of five common vision encoders under a unified pipeline ($\approx$20k GPU-hours total), and report three findings. First, retraining each subset from scratch reveals encoder rankings that differ from those obtained by masking encoders on a fixed checkpoint, including which encoder ranks first overall. Second, we decompose each encoder's contribution into two axes, \emph{Capacity}, the score an encoder reaches on its own, and \emph{Necessity}, the drop when it is removed from the full pool. The two axes are not interchangeable. Pairing the two highest-Capacity encoders is suboptimal, while pairing a high-Capacity anchor with an adaptive complement matches the full five-encoder model. Adding further encoders beyond this pair yields only marginal gains. Third, at fixed parameter count, per-encoder pre-projector effective rank explains the residual score variation. The strongest pairs combine an anchor whose rank survives joint training with a complement whose rank \emph{expands} under it, suggesting that higher-rank, less-collapsed projector inputs correspond to a more favorable optimization regime at the encoder–projector interface. Together, the Capacity–Necessity decomposition and the pre-projector rank analysis, along with comprehensive evaluation through retraining, expose a methodological gap in multi-encoder LVLM design, and offer concrete primitives for closing it.