Frontier Task Synthesis Via Solution-Centric Evolution

The rapid progress of frontier large language models has led to widespread benchmark saturation, limiting the ability of existing datasets to differentiate model capabilities or provide useful training signal. For instance, on LiveCodeBench, frontier models achieve over (99%) Pass@1 on easy splits and exceed (90%) Pass@1 on average across difficulty levels. Constructing new, sufficiently challenging datasets typically requires substantial human effort, creating a bottleneck for continued progress. We study a solution-centric evolutionary approach that automatically transforms existing programming problems into substantially harder variants. Rather than generating problems from scratch, the approach evolves reference solutions through structured transformations and derives corresponding problem statements and tests from the evolved solutions. This design grounds generation in executable semantics, enabling scalable construction of high-quality, diverse, and difficult tasks with verifiable correctness. Applied to LiveCodeBench and SciCode, it produces evolved tasks that are substantially more difficult while preserving validity, reference correctness, and diversity. Importantly, these tasks remain challenging even for the model that generates them, creating the prerequisite for self-improvement rather than merely expanding an evaluation set. We further show that RL on evolved tasks improves held-out coding performance: for \texttt{gpt-oss-20b}, seed+evolved training achieves (+8.7) and (+8.3) Pass@1 gains on LCB v6 Hard and LCB-Pro Easy, exceeding seed-only gains by (70.7%) and (34.8%), respectively. This closes the loop from self-generated challenges to capability improvement, demonstrating that saturated benchmarks can be converted into both stronger evaluations and reusable training signal.