Human-AI Teaming Through the Lens of Calibration

We study models for human-AI teaming through the lens of statistical calibration. We assume the team consists of an AI model and human---both of which are calibrated with respect to some partitioning of the feature space---and expose how the calibration assumptions propagate into the teaming framework. In particular, we consider frameworks that either (i) combine human and model predictions or (ii) delegate prediction responsibility to either a human or model. We show via theoretical and empirical results that existing methods for combination do not preserve the human's degree of calibration. Methods for delegation (by the very act of delegation) preserve calibration of the downstream predictors but can place high-capacity demands on the meta-classifier that determines which should predict. This latter result suggests human-AI complementarity and correct delegation place opposite demands on the delegation model.