Act, Validate, Adapt: Closing the Causal Discovery-Control Loop

Every control action on a physical system is already a do-operator intervention, yet causal discovery and control are typically treated as separate stages. This separation leaves deployed controllers unable to test whether the causal graph they rely on remains valid under changing operating conditions. We present \textsc{PolicyGRID}, a closed-loop framework that uses actuator interventions to validate candidate causal edges, fits a structural causal model over the validated graph, and reuses that graph for both policy optimization and latent-regime monitoring. In a multi-actuator physical simulation with latent operating regimes (building energy management), interventional graph validation reduces closed-loop energy use by 21\% at a standard comfort target relative to an otherwise identical observation-only graph, while improving four-way latent-context identification from 61.2\% to 80.8\%. A targeted ablation shows that the gains originate in graph pruning. Validation removes 16 of 47 candidate edges; with coefficient training held fixed, the validated graph reduces closed-loop energy relative to the unvalidated candidate set, while refitting coefficients on the same graph does not. On a live physical testbed, the same pipeline runs without code changes, performs 21 physical interventions, discovers 16 edges, and produces a target-responsive control policy where the observation-only baseline is insensitive to the comfort-energy target. These results show that physical controllers can use their own actions to validate causal structure and improve downstream control under latent regime shifts.