Timezone: »

 
Spotlight
What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated?
Hans Hao-Hsun Hsu · Yuesong Shen · Christian Tomani · Daniel Cremers

Tue Dec 06 09:00 AM -- 11:00 AM (PST) @
in Lightning Talks 1B-1 »

Given the importance of getting calibrated predictions and reliable uncertainty estimations, various post-hoc calibration methods have been developed for neural networks on standard multi-class classification tasks. However, these methods are not well suited for calibrating graph neural networks (GNNs), which presents unique challenges such as accounting for the graph structure and the graph-induced correlations between the nodes. In this work, we conduct a systematic study on the calibration qualities of GNN node predictions. In particular, we identify five factors which influence the calibration of GNNs: general under-confident tendency, diversity of nodewise predictive distributions, distance to training nodes, relative confidence level, and neighborhood similarity. Furthermore, based on the insights from this study, we design a novel calibration method named Graph Attention Temperature Scaling (GATS), which is tailored for calibrating graph neural networks. GATS incorporates designs that address all the identified influential factors and produces nodewise temperature scaling using an attention-based architecture. GATS is accuracy-preserving, data-efficient, and expressive at the same time. Our experiments empirically verify the effectiveness of GATS, demonstrating that it can consistently achieve state-of-the-art calibration results on various graph datasets for different GNN backbones.

Keywords: graph neural networks · Post-hoc Calibration

Author Information

Hans Hao-Hsun Hsu (Technische Universität München)
Yuesong Shen (Technical University of Munich)
Christian Tomani (Technical University Munich)
Daniel Cremers (Technical University of Munich)

Related Events (a corresponding poster, oral, or spotlight)

More from the Same Authors