Timezone: »
The many successes of deep neural networks (DNNs) over the past decade have largely been driven by computational scale rather than insights from biological intelligence. Here, we explore if these trends have also carried concomitant improvements in explaining the visual strategies humans rely on for object recognition. We do this by comparing two related but distinct properties of visual strategies in humans and DNNs: where they believe important visual features are in images and how they use those features to categorize objects. Across 84 different DNNs trained on ImageNet and three independent datasets measuring the where and the how of human visual strategies for object recognition on those images, we find a systematic trade-off between DNN categorization accuracy and alignment with human visual strategies for object recognition. \textit{State-of-the-art DNNs are progressively becoming less aligned with humans as their accuracy improves}. We rectify this growing issue with our neural harmonizer: a general-purpose training routine that both aligns DNN and human visual strategies and improves categorization accuracy. Our work represents the first demonstration that the scaling laws that are guiding the design of DNNs today have also produced worse models of human vision. We release our code and data at https://serre-lab.github.io/Harmonization to help the field build more human-like DNNs.
Author Information
Thomas FEL (Brown University)
Ivan F Rodriguez Rodriguez (Brown University)
Drew Linsley (Brown University)
We need artificial vision to create intelligent machines that can reason about the world, but existing artificial vision systems cannot solve many of the visual challenges that we encounter and routinely solve in our daily lives. I look to biological vision to inspire new solutions to challenges faced by artificial vision. I do this by testing complementary hypotheses that connect computational theory with systems- and cognitive-neuroscience level experimental research: 1. Computational challenges for artificial vision can be identified through systematic comparisons with biological vision, and solved with algorithms inspired by those of biological vision. 2. Improved algorithms for artificial vision will lead to better methods for gleaning insight from large-scale experimental data, and better models for understanding the relationship between neural computation and perception.
Thomas Serre (Brown University)
More from the Same Authors
-
2022 : The emergence of visual simulation in task-optimized recurrent neural networks »
Alekh Karkada Ashok · Lakshmi Narasimhan Govindarajan · Drew Linsley · David Sheinberg · Thomas Serre -
2023 Poster: Break It Down: Evidence for Structural Compositionality in Neural Networks »
Michael Lepori · Thomas Serre · Ellie Pavlick -
2023 Poster: Performance-optimized deep neural networks are evolving into worse models of inferotemporal visual cortex »
Drew Linsley · Ivan F Rodriguez Rodriguez · Thomas FEL · Michael Arcaro · Saloni Sharma · Margaret Livingstone · Thomas Serre -
2023 Poster: A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimation »
Thomas FEL · Victor Boutin · Louis Béthune · Remi Cadene · Mazda Moayeri · Léo Andéol · Mathieu Chalvidal · Thomas Serre -
2023 Poster: Unlocking Feature Visualization for Deep Network with MAgnitude Constrained Optimization »
Thomas FEL · Thibaut Boissin · Victor Boutin · Agustin PICARD · Paul Novello · Julien Colin · Drew Linsley · Tom ROUSSEAU · Remi Cadene · Laurent Gardes · Thomas Serre -
2023 Poster: On the explainable properties of 1-Lipschitz Neural Networks: An Optimal Transport Perspective »
Mathieu Serrurier · Franck Mamalet · Thomas FEL · Louis Béthune · Thibaut Boissin -
2023 Poster: Learning Functional Transduction »
Mathieu Chalvidal · Thomas Serre · Rufin VanRullen -
2023 Poster: Computing a human-like reaction time metric from stable recurrent vision models »
Lore Goetschalckx · Lakshmi Narasimhan Govindarajan · Alekh Karkada Ashok · Thomas Serre -
2022 Poster: Meta-Reinforcement Learning with Self-Modifying Networks »
Mathieu Chalvidal · Thomas Serre · Rufin VanRullen -
2022 Poster: A Benchmark for Compositional Visual Reasoning »
Aimen Zerroug · Mohit Vaishnav · Julien Colin · Sebastian Musslick · Thomas Serre -
2022 Poster: Diversity vs. Recognizability: Human-like generalization in one-shot generative models »
Victor Boutin · Lakshya Singhal · Xavier Thomas · Thomas Serre -
2022 Poster: Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence Measure »
Paul Novello · Thomas FEL · David Vigouroux -
2022 Poster: What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methods »
Julien Colin · Thomas FEL · Remi Cadene · Thomas Serre -
2021 Poster: Tracking Without Re-recognition in Humans and Machines »
Drew Linsley · Girik Malik · Junkyung Kim · Lakshmi Narasimhan Govindarajan · Ennio Mingolla · Thomas Serre -
2021 Poster: Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysis »
Thomas FEL · Remi Cadene · Mathieu Chalvidal · Matthieu Cord · David Vigouroux · Thomas Serre -
2020 Poster: Stable and expressive recurrent vision models »
Drew Linsley · Alekh Karkada Ashok · Lakshmi Narasimhan Govindarajan · Rex Liu · Thomas Serre -
2020 Spotlight: Stable and expressive recurrent vision models »
Drew Linsley · Alekh Karkada Ashok · Lakshmi Narasimhan Govindarajan · Rex Liu · Thomas Serre -
2020 Session: Orals & Spotlights Track 29: Neuroscience »
Aasa Feragen · Thomas Serre -
2018 Poster: Learning long-range spatial dependencies with horizontal gated recurrent units »
Drew Linsley · Junkyung Kim · Vijay Veerabadran · Charles Windolf · Thomas Serre -
2016 Poster: How Deep is the Feature Analysis underlying Rapid Visual Categorization? »
Sven Eberhardt · Jonah G Cader · Thomas Serre -
2013 Poster: Neural representation of action sequences: how far can a simple snippet-matching model take us? »
Cheston Tan · Jedediah M Singer · Thomas Serre · David Sheinberg · Tomaso Poggio