Timezone: »
Advances in machine learning owe much to the public availability of high-quality benchmark datasets and the well-defined problem settings that they encapsulate. Examples are abundant: CIFAR-10 for image classification, COCO for object detection, SQuAD for question answering, BookCorpus for language modelling, etc. There is a general belief that the accessibility of high-quality benchmark datasets is central to the thriving of our community.
However, three prominent issues affect benchmark datasets: data scarcity, privacy, and bias. They already manifest in many existing benchmarks, and also make the curation and publication of new benchmarks difficult (if not impossible) in numerous high-stakes domains, including healthcare, finance, and education. Hence, although ML holds strong promise in these domains, the lack of high-quality benchmark datasets creates a significant hurdle for the development of methodology and algorithms and leads to missed opportunities.
Synthetic data is a promising solution to the key issues of benchmark dataset curation and publication. Specifically, high-quality synthetic data generation could be done while addressing the following major issues.
1. Data Scarcity. The training and evaluation of ML algorithms require datasets with a sufficient sample size. Note that even if the algorithm can learn from very few samples, we still need sufficient validation data for model evaluation. However, it is often challenging to obtain the desired number of samples due to the inherent data scarcity (e.g. people with unique characteristics, patients with rare diseases etc.) or the cost and feasibility of certain data collection. There has been very active research in cross-domain and out-of-domain data generation, as well as generation from a few samples. Once the generator is trained, one could obtain arbitrarily large synthetic datasets.
2. Privacy. In many key applications, ML algorithms rely on record-level data collected from human subjects, which leads to privacy concerns and legal risks. As a result, data owners are often hesitant to publish datasets for the research community. Even if they are willing to, accessing the datasets often requires significant time and effort from the researchers. Synthetic data is regarded as one potential way to promote privacy. The 2019 NeurIPS Competition "Synthetic data hide and seek challenge" demonstrates the difficulty in performing privacy attacks on synthetic data. Many recent works look further into the theoretical and practical aspects of synthetic data and privacy.
3. Bias and under-representation. The benchmark dataset may be subject to data collection bias and under-represent certain groups (e.g. people with less-privileged access to technology). Using these datasets as benchmarks would (implicitly) encourage the community to build algorithms that reflect or even exploit the existing bias. This is likely to hamper the adoption of ML in high-stake applications that require fairness, such as finance and justice. Synthetic data provides a way to curate less biased benchmark data. Specifically, (conditional) generative models can be used to augment any under-represented group in the original dataset. Recent works have shown that training on synthetically augmented data leads to consistent improvements in robustness and generalisation.
Why do we need this workshop? Despite the growing interest in using synthetic data to empower ML, this agenda is still challenging because it involves multiple research fields and various industry stakeholders. Specifically, it calls for the collaboration of the researchers in generative models, privacy, and fairness. Existing research in generative models focuses on generating high-fidelity data, often neglecting the privacy and fairness aspect. On the other hand, the existing research in privacy and fairness often focuses on the discriminative setting rather than the generative setting. Finally, while generative modelling in images and tabular data has matured, the generation of time series and multi-modal data is still a vibrant area of research, especially in complex domains in healthcare and finance. The data modality and characteristics differ significantly across application domains and industries. It is therefore important to get the inputs from the industry experts such that the benchmark reflects reality.
The goal of this workshop is to provide a platform for vigorous discussion with researchers in various fields of ML and industry experts in the hope to progress the idea of using synthetic data to empower ML research. The workshop also provides a forum for constructive debates and identifications of strengths and weaknesses with respect to alternative approaches, e.g. federated learning
Fri 6:00 a.m. - 6:15 a.m.
|
Opening remark
SlidesLive Video » |
🔗 |
Fri 6:15 a.m. - 6:40 a.m.
|
Invited Talk #1, Differentially Private Learning with Margin Guarantees, Mehryar Mohri
(
Invited Talk
)
SlidesLive Video » Title: Differentially Private Learning with Margin Guarantees Abstract: Preserving privacy is a crucial objective for machine learning algorithms. But, despite the remarkable theoretical and algorithmic progress in differential privacy over the last decade or more, its application to learning still faces several obstacles. A recent series of publications have shown that differentially private PAC learning of infinite hypothesis sets is not possible, even for common hypothesis sets such as that of linear functions. Another rich body of literature has studied differentially private empirical risk minimization in a constrained optimization setting and shown that the guarantees are necessarily dimension-dependent. In the unconstrained setting, dimension-independent bounds have been given, but they admit a dependency on the norm of a vector that can be extremely large, which makes them uninformative. These results raise some fundamental questions about private learning with common high-dimensional problems: is differentially private learning with favorable (dimension-independent) guarantees possible for standard hypothesis sets? This talk presents a series of new differentially private algorithms for learning linear classifiers, kernel classifiers, and neural-network classifiers with dimension-independent, confidence-margin guarantees. Joint work with Raef Bassily and Ananda Theertha Suresh. |
Mehryar Mohri 🔗 |
Fri 6:40 a.m. - 7:20 a.m.
|
Privacy Panel
(
Discussion Panel
)
SlidesLive Video » Synthetic data and privacy. |
Mario Fritz · Katrina Ligett · Vamsi Potluru · Shuai Tang 🔗 |
Fri 7:20 a.m. - 8:00 a.m.
|
Contributed Talks Part 1/2
(
Contributed Talks
)
Papers:
|
🔗 |
Fri 8:00 a.m. - 8:30 a.m.
|
Morning Break
|
🔗 |
Fri 8:30 a.m. - 9:20 a.m.
|
Contributed Talks Part 2/2
(
Contributed Talks
)
Papers:
|
🔗 |
Fri 9:20 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.
|
Invited Talk #2, Kalyan Veeramachaneni, SDMetrics: Evaluating Synthetic Data
(
Invited Talk
)
SlidesLive Video » Compared to other machine learning tasks like classification and regression, synthetic data generation is a new area of inquiry for machine learning. One challenge we encountered early on in working with synthetic data was the lack of standardized metrics for evaluating it. Although evaluation for tabular synthetic data is less subjective than for ML-generated images or natural language, it comes with its own specific considerations. For instance, metrics must take into account what the data is being generated for, as well as tradeoffs between quality, privacy, and utility that are inherent to this type of data. To begin addressing this need, we created an open source library called SDMetrics, which contains a number of synthetic data evaluation tools. We identified inherent hierarchies that exist in these evaluations — for example, columnwise comparison vs. correlation matrix comparison — and built ways to test and validate these metrics. The library also provides user-friendly, focused reports and mechanisms to prevent "metric fatigue.” |
Kalyan Veeramachaneni 🔗 |
Fri 9:45 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.
|
Announcing the Best Paper Awards
(
Award
)
SlidesLive Video » |
🔗 |
Fri 10:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
|
Lunch and Poster Session
(
Poster Session
)
|
🔗 |
Fri 11:30 a.m. - 12:10 p.m.
|
Fairness Panel
(
Discussion Panel
)
SlidesLive Video » Synthetic data and fairness. |
Freedom Gumedze · Rachel Cummings · Bo Li · Robert Tillman · Edward Choi 🔗 |
Fri 12:10 p.m. - 12:35 p.m.
|
Achievements and Challenges Part 1/2
(
Invited Talk
)
SlidesLive Video » Progress, achievements and challenges in synthetic data. |
Dimitris Vlitas · Dino Oglic 🔗 |
Fri 12:35 p.m. - 1:00 p.m.
|
Invited Talk #3, Synthetic medical data – needed to bring ML in medicine up to speed?
(
Invited Talk
)
SlidesLive Video » Synthetic medical data – needed to bring ML in medicine up to speed? To bring medical AI to the next level, in terms of exceeding state-of-art and not just developing but also implementing novel algorithms as decision support tools into clinical practice, we need to bring data scientists, laboratory scientists and physician (researchers) together. To succeed with this, we need to bring medical data out in the open, to benefit from the best possible models being developed jointly by the data science community. Solving the data privacy issues – in terms of creating synthetic data sets reflecting the correlations of the original data sets without jeopardizing data privacy – is needed. Here you get the perspectives on real clinical challenges, real data science approaches being implemented into clinical practice, regulatory issues and real unmet needs of synthetic data sets from the perspective of a physician researcher. |
Carsten Utoft Niemann 🔗 |
Fri 1:00 p.m. - 1:30 p.m.
|
Afternoon Break
|
🔗 |
Fri 1:30 p.m. - 1:55 p.m.
|
Invited Talk #4, The Fifth Paradigm of Scientific Discovery, Max Welling
(
Invited Talk
)
SlidesLive Video » Title: The Fifth Paradigm of Scientific Discovery Abstract: I will argue that we may be at the beginning of a new paradigm of scientific discovery based on deep learning combined with ab initio simulation of physical processes. We envision a system where simulations generate data to train neural surrogate models that in turn will accelerate simulations. The result will be an active learning framework where accurate data is acquired when the surrogate model is uncertain about it’s predictions. We will argue this hybrid approach can accelerate scientific discovery, for instance the the search for new drugs, and materials. |
Max Welling 🔗 |
Fri 1:55 p.m. - 2:20 p.m.
|
Achievements and Challenges Part 2/2
(
Invited Talk
)
SlidesLive Video » Progress, achievements, and challenges in synthetic data. |
Zhaozhi Qian · Tucker Balch · Sergul Aydore 🔗 |
Fri 2:20 p.m. - 2:45 p.m.
|
Invited Talk #5, Privacy-Preserving Data Synthesis for General Purposes, Bo Li
(
Invited Talk
)
SlidesLive Video » Privacy-Preserving Data Synthesis for General Purposes The recent success of deep neural networks (DNNs) hinges on the availability of large-scale datasets; however, training on such datasets often poses privacy risks for sensitive training information, such as face images and medical records of individuals. In this talk, I will mainly discuss how to explore the power of generative models and gradient sparsity, and talk about different scalable privacy-preserving generative models in both centralized and decentralized settings. In particular, I will introduce our recent work on large-scale privacy-preserving data generative models leveraging gradient compression with convergence guarantees. I will also introduce how to train generative models with privacy guarantees in heterogeneous environments, where data of local agents come from diverse distributions. We will finally discuss some potential applications for different privacy-preserving data synthesis strategies. |
Bo Li 🔗 |
Fri 2:45 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
|
Closing remark
SlidesLive Video » |
🔗 |
Author Information
Mihaela van der Schaar (University of Cambridge)
Zhaozhi Qian (University of Cambridge)
Sergul Aydore (AWS AI)
Dimitris Vlitas
Dino Oglic (AstraZeneca)
Tucker Balch (J.P. Morgan)
Tucker Balch is a managing director at J.P. Morgan AI Research. He is a professor on leave from Georgia Tech. He is interested in research problems concerning multi agent social behavior. This interest has led to research in a wide range of topics from financial markets to to tracking and modeling the behavior of ants, honeybees and monkeys. He teaches courses in Robotics, Machine Learning and Finance. In addition to his teaching on campus, more than 170,000 students have take his courses online via Coursera and Udacity. He is Chief Scientist and co-founder of Lucena Research, an investment software firm that applies Machine Learning and Big Data approaches to investment problems. Balch has published 120 conference papers and journal articles. His work has been covered by CNN, New Scientist, Institutional Investor, and the New York Times. His graduated students work at NASA/JPL, Boston Dynamics, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citadel, AQR, and Yahoo! Finance. Before his career in academia, Balch was a USAF F-15 pilot.
More from the Same Authors
-
2021 Spotlight: On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation »
Alicia Curth · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Spotlight: Explaining Latent Representations with a Corpus of Examples »
Jonathan Crabbe · Zhaozhi Qian · Fergus Imrie · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 : Really Doing Great at Estimating CATE? A Critical Look at ML Benchmarking Practices in Treatment Effect Estimation »
Alicia Curth · David Svensson · Jim Weatherall · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 : The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation »
Alex Chan · Ioana Bica · Alihan Hüyük · Daniel Jarrett · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 : Adaptively Identifying Patient Populations With Treatment Benefit in Clinical Trials »
Alicia Curth · Alihan Hüyük · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 : D-CIPHER: Discovery of Closed-form Partial Differential Equations »
Krzysztof Kacprzyk · Zhaozhi Qian · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 : Differentially Private Gradient Boosting on Linear Learners for Tabular Data »
Saeyoung Rho · Shuai Tang · Sergul Aydore · Michael Kearns · Aaron Roth · Yu-Xiang Wang · Steven Wu · Cedric Archambeau -
2022 Spotlight: Lightning Talks 2A-3 »
David Buterez · Chengan He · Xuan Kan · Yutong Lin · Konstantin Schürholt · Yu Yang · Louis Annabi · Wei Dai · Xiaotian Cheng · Alexandre Pitti · Ze Liu · Jon Paul Janet · Jun Saito · Boris Knyazev · Mathias Quoy · Zheng Zhang · James Zachary · Steven J Kiddle · Xavier Giro-i-Nieto · Chang Liu · Hejie Cui · Zilong Zhang · Hakan Bilen · Damian Borth · Dino Oglic · Holly Rushmeier · Han Hu · Xiangyang Ji · Yi Zhou · Nanning Zheng · Ying Guo · Pietro Liò · Stephen Lin · Carl Yang · Yue Cao -
2022 Spotlight: Graph Neural Networks with Adaptive Readouts »
David Buterez · Jon Paul Janet · Steven J Kiddle · Dino Oglic · Pietro Liò -
2022 Affinity Workshop: Women in Machine Learning - Virtual »
Mariam Arab · Konstantina Palla · Sergul Aydore · Gloria Namanya · Beliz Gunel · Kimia Nadjahi · Soomin Aga Lee -
2022 : Practical Approaches for Fair Learning with Multitype and Multivariate Sensitive Attributes »
Tennison Liu · Alex Chan · Boris van Breugel · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 : Closing Remarks »
Cheng Zhang · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 : Achievements and Challenges Part 2/2 »
Zhaozhi Qian · Tucker Balch · Sergul Aydore -
2022 : Achievements and Challenges Part 1/2 »
Dimitris Vlitas · Dino Oglic -
2022 : Fast Learning of Multidimensional Hawkes Processes via Frank-Wolfe »
Renbo Zhao · Niccolo Dalmasso · Mohsen Ghassemi · Vamsi Potluru · Tucker Balch · Manuela Veloso -
2022 : Panel Discussion »
Cheng Zhang · Mihaela van der Schaar · Ilya Shpitser · Aapo Hyvarinen · Yoshua Bengio · Bernhard Schölkopf -
2022 Workshop: Causal Machine Learning for Real-World Impact »
Nick Pawlowski · Jeroen Berrevoets · Caroline Uhler · Kun Zhang · Mihaela van der Schaar · Cheng Zhang -
2022 : Opening Remarks »
Cheng Zhang · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 Poster: Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based Explanations »
Jonathan Crabbé · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 Poster: Online Decision Mediation »
Daniel Jarrett · Alihan Hüyük · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 Poster: Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability »
Jonathan Crabbé · Alicia Curth · Ioana Bica · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 Poster: Transfer Learning on Heterogeneous Feature Spaces for Treatment Effects Estimation »
Ioana Bica · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 Poster: Data-IQ: Characterizing subgroups with heterogeneous outcomes in tabular data »
Nabeel Seedat · Jonathan Crabbé · Ioana Bica · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 Poster: Composite Feature Selection Using Deep Ensembles »
Fergus Imrie · Alexander Norcliffe · Pietro Lió · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 Poster: Graph Neural Networks with Adaptive Readouts »
David Buterez · Jon Paul Janet · Steven J Kiddle · Dino Oglic · Pietro Liò -
2022 Poster: Private Synthetic Data for Multitask Learning and Marginal Queries »
Giuseppe Vietri · Cedric Archambeau · Sergul Aydore · William Brown · Michael Kearns · Aaron Roth · Ankit Siva · Shuai Tang · Steven Wu -
2022 Poster: Synthetic Model Combination: An Instance-wise Approach to Unsupervised Ensemble Learning »
Alex Chan · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2022 Affinity Workshop: Women in Machine Learning »
Mariam Arab · Konstantina Palla · Sergul Aydore · Gloria Namanya · Beliz Gunel · Kimia Nadjahi · Soomin Aga Lee -
2021 : Invited talk 8 »
Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 : Invited talk #5: Mihaela van der Schaar »
Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 : Mihaela Van Der Schaar Q&A »
Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 : Mihaela Van Der Schaar »
Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: Invariant Causal Imitation Learning for Generalizable Policies »
Ioana Bica · Daniel Jarrett · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: Explaining Latent Representations with a Corpus of Examples »
Jonathan Crabbe · Zhaozhi Qian · Fergus Imrie · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: Time-series Generation by Contrastive Imitation »
Daniel Jarrett · Ioana Bica · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: Closing the loop in medical decision support by understanding clinical decision-making: A case study on organ transplantation »
Yuchao Qin · Fergus Imrie · Alihan Hüyük · Daniel Jarrett · alexander gimson · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: DECAF: Generating Fair Synthetic Data Using Causally-Aware Generative Networks »
Boris van Breugel · Trent Kyono · Jeroen Berrevoets · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: MIRACLE: Causally-Aware Imputation via Learning Missing Data Mechanisms »
Trent Kyono · Yao Zhang · Alexis Bellot · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: Conformal Time-series Forecasting »
Kamile Stankeviciute · Ahmed M. Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: Integrating Expert ODEs into Neural ODEs: Pharmacology and Disease Progression »
Zhaozhi Qian · William Zame · Lucas Fleuren · Paul Elbers · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data »
Alicia Curth · Changhee Lee · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation »
Alicia Curth · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: SyncTwin: Treatment Effect Estimation with Longitudinal Outcomes »
Zhaozhi Qian · Yao Zhang · Ioana Bica · Angela Wood · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: Estimating Multi-cause Treatment Effects via Single-cause Perturbation »
Zhaozhi Qian · Alicia Curth · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2021 Poster: Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbations »
Ecenaz Erdemir · Jeffrey Bickford · Luca Melis · Sergul Aydore -
2020 Poster: Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Uncertainty Quantification »
Hyun-Suk Lee · Yao Zhang · William Zame · Cong Shen · Jang-Won Lee · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 Poster: Learning outside the Black-Box: The pursuit of interpretable models »
Jonathan Crabbe · Yao Zhang · William Zame · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 Poster: Strictly Batch Imitation Learning by Energy-based Distribution Matching »
Daniel Jarrett · Ioana Bica · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 Poster: Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial Networks »
Ioana Bica · James Jordon · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 Poster: Gradient Regularized V-Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes »
Yao Zhang · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 Poster: OrganITE: Optimal transplant donor organ offering using an individual treatment effect »
Jeroen Berrevoets · James Jordon · Ioana Bica · alexander gimson · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 : Q&A for invited speaker, Mihaela van der Schaar »
Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 : Interpretable AutoML: Powering the machine learning revolution in healthcare in the era of Covid-19 and beyond »
Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 Poster: CASTLE: Regularization via Auxiliary Causal Graph Discovery »
Trent Kyono · Yao Zhang · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 : When and How to Lift the Lockdown? Global COVID-19 Scenario Analysis and Policy Assessment using Compartmental Gaussian Processes »
Zhaozhi Qian -
2020 Poster: VIME: Extending the Success of Self- and Semi-supervised Learning to Tabular Domain »
Jinsung Yoon · Yao Zhang · James Jordon · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 Poster: When and How to Lift the Lockdown? Global COVID-19 Scenario Analysis and Policy Assessment using Compartmental Gaussian Processes »
Zhaozhi Qian · Ahmed Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2020 Oral: When and How to Lift the Lockdown? Global COVID-19 Scenario Analysis and Policy Assessment using Compartmental Gaussian Processes »
Zhaozhi Qian · Ahmed Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2019 Poster: Dynamic Local Regret for Non-convex Online Forecasting »
Sergul Aydore · Tianhao Zhu · Dean Foster -
2019 Poster: Attentive State-Space Modeling of Disease Progression »
Ahmed Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2019 Poster: Demystifying Black-box Models with Symbolic Metamodels »
Ahmed Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2019 Poster: Time-series Generative Adversarial Networks »
Jinsung Yoon · Daniel Jarrett · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2019 Poster: Differentially Private Bagging: Improved utility and cheaper privacy than subsample-and-aggregate »
James Jordon · Jinsung Yoon · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2019 Poster: Conditional Independence Testing using Generative Adversarial Networks »
Alexis Bellot · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2019 Spotlight: Conditional Independence Testing using Generative Adversarial Networks »
Alexis Bellot · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2018 : Invited Talk 5: ML-Based Evidence that High Frequency Trading Has Made the Market More Efficient »
Tucker Balch -
2018 Poster: Multitask Boosting for Survival Analysis with Competing Risks »
Alexis Bellot · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2018 Poster: Forecasting Treatment Responses Over Time Using Recurrent Marginal Structural Networks »
Bryan Lim · Ahmed M. Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2017 : Coffee break and Poster Session II »
Mohamed Kane · Albert Haque · Vagelis Papalexakis · John Guibas · Peter Li · Carlos Arias · Eric Nalisnick · Padhraic Smyth · Frank Rudzicz · Xia Zhu · Theodore Willke · Noemie Elhadad · Hans Raffauf · Harini Suresh · Paroma Varma · Yisong Yue · Ognjen (Oggi) Rudovic · Luca Foschini · Syed Rameel Ahmad · Hasham ul Haq · Valerio Maggio · Giuseppe Jurman · Sonali Parbhoo · Pouya Bashivan · Jyoti Islam · Mirco Musolesi · Chris Wu · Alexander Ratner · Jared Dunnmon · Cristóbal Esteban · Aram Galstyan · Greg Ver Steeg · Hrant Khachatrian · Marc Górriz · Mihaela van der Schaar · Anton Nemchenko · Manasi Patwardhan · Tanay Tandon -
2017 Poster: DPSCREEN: Dynamic Personalized Screening »
Kartik Ahuja · William Zame · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2017 Poster: Deep Multi-task Gaussian Processes for Survival Analysis with Competing Risks »
Ahmed M. Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2017 Spotlight: Deep Multi-task Gaussian Processes for Survival Analysis with Competing Risks »
Ahmed M. Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2017 Poster: Bayesian Inference of Individualized Treatment Effects using Multi-task Gaussian Processes »
Ahmed M. Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2016 Poster: Balancing Suspense and Surprise: Timely Decision Making with Endogenous Information Acquisition »
Ahmed M. Alaa · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2016 Poster: A Non-parametric Learning Method for Confidently Estimating Patient's Clinical State and Dynamics »
William Hoiles · Mihaela van der Schaar -
2016 Poster: Greedy Feature Construction »
Dino Oglic · Thomas Gärtner -
2014 Poster: Discovering, Learning and Exploiting Relevance »
Cem Tekin · Mihaela van der Schaar