Timezone: »

 
Uncertainty estimation under model misspecification in neural network regression
Maria Cervera · Rafael Dätwyler · Francesco D'Angelo · Hamza Keurti · Benjamin F. Grewe · Christian Henning

@
in Your Model is Wrong: Robustness and misspecification in probabilistic modeling »

Although neural networks are powerful function approximators, the underlying modelling assumptions ultimately define the likelihood and thus the model class they are parameterizing. In classification, these assumptions are minimal as the commonly employed softmax is capable of representing any discrete distribution over a finite set of outcomes. In regression, however, restrictive assumptions on the type of continuous distribution to be realized are typically placed, like the dominant choice of training via mean-squared error and its underlying Gaussianity assumption. Recently, modelling advances allow to be agnostic to the type of continuous distribution to be modelled, granting regression the flexibility of classification models. While past studies stress the benefit of such flexible regression models in terms of performance, here we study the effect of the model choice on uncertainty estimation. We highlight that under model misspecification, aleatoric uncertainty is not properly captured, and that a Bayesian treatment of a misspecified model leads to unreliable epistemic uncertainty estimates. Overall, our study provides an overview on how modelling choices in regression may influence uncertainty estimation and thus any downstream decision making process.

Author Information

Maria Cervera (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology)
Rafael Dätwyler (ETH Zurich)
Francesco D'Angelo (ETH Zurich)
Hamza Keurti (ETH)
Benjamin F. Grewe (ETH Zurich)
Christian Henning (ETH Zurich)

More from the Same Authors