Timezone: »

 
Poster
Can we globally optimize cross-validation loss? Quasiconvexity in ridge regression
Will Stephenson · Zachary Frangella · Madeleine Udell · Tamara Broderick

Thu Dec 09 04:30 PM -- 06:00 PM (PST) @
in Poster Session 7 »

Models like LASSO and ridge regression are extensively used in practice due to their interpretability, ease of use, and strong theoretical guarantees. Cross-validation (CV) is widely used for hyperparameter tuning in these models, but do practical methods minimize the true out-of-sample loss? A recent line of research promises to show that the optimum of the CV loss matches the optimum of the out-of-sample loss (possibly after simple corrections). It remains to show how tractable it is to minimize the CV loss.In the present paper, we show that, in the case of ridge regression, the CV loss may fail to be quasiconvex and thus may have multiple local optima. We can guarantee that the CV loss is quasiconvex in at least one case: when the spectrum of the covariate matrix is nearly flat and the noise in the observed responses is not too high. More generally, we show that quasiconvexity status is independent of many properties of the observed data (response norm, covariate-matrix right singular vectors and singular-value scaling) and has a complex dependence on the few that remain. We empirically confirm our theory using simulated experiments.

Keywords: Theory · Optimization · Interpretability

Author Information

Will Stephenson (MIT)
Zachary Frangella (Cornell University)
Madeleine Udell (Cornell)
Tamara Broderick (MIT)

More from the Same Authors